Journal Home
Search for

Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages 37-44 (August 2010)


View previous. 6 of 12 View next.

Discrimination between conspecific odour samples in the horse (Equus caballus)

Becky HothersallaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Patricia Harrisb, Lotta Sörtoftc, Christine J. Nicola

Accepted 11 May 2010. published online 07 June 2010.

Abstract 

Behavioural observations suggest that smell is important in social discriminations between horses but balanced studies of this capacity are lacking. We used a habituation–discrimination procedure to investigate the ability of horses to distinguish between pairs of odour samples from different individuals. In Study 1, separate tests were conducted for urine, faeces or fleece fabric previously rubbed on the coat (to pick up body odour samples (BOS)) and donor pairs differed in sex, and age. 10 pregnant mares each underwent three tests, one per sample type. A test consisted of three successive 2-min presentations of a sample from Individual A with a simultaneous presentation of a sample from Individual B during the final presentation. Doubly repeated measures ANOVA indicated a main effect of sample type on investigative response (df=2, f=7.98, P=0.004): durations were longer for BOS than for urine or faeces but habituation across trials was most consistent for urine. In the final presentation, mares demonstrated discrimination by investigating the novel urine sample (B) more than the repeated sample (novel: median 8.0s, IQR=10; repeated: median 2.5s, IQR=6; z=−2.558, P=0.008). In Study 2, urine samples from castrated male donors were used and neither mares nor their 4-month-old foals discriminated between samples from different individuals in the final presentation. The findings suggest that urine odour may contain some information that horses can use to discriminate between conspecifics. This may be limited to the level of broad categories such as sex or reproductive status; further investigation is needed to reveal what functional information can be transmitted and what compounds are involved.

a Animal Welfare & Behaviour Group, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK

b WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Freeby Lane, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE14 4RT, UK

c Hartpury College, Hartpury, Gloucestershire GL19 3BE, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Animal Welfare & Behaviour Group, Division of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset BS40 5DU, UK. Tel.: +44 117 331 9062.

PII: S0168-1591(10)00156-5

doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.002


View previous. 6 of 12 View next.